U.S. New World, Africa, Asia and Australia ﹑ have a large number of colonial immigration and tourism crowd. British conservative social values, and there are many hypocritical pay attention to the liturgy, as in refuse to accept human nature Some of the British colonial travel writers to find inspiration and excitement, for them, the colony is full of mystery and adventure color, and a conservative Englishman can ride in this romance. Especially in the nineteenth century, European countries or whether the colony became a British writer of travel are the subject of writing, and his works often reveal Britain and other countries, the British binary opposition view: us / them, familiar / unfamiliar, civilization / nature, reason / emotion.
in the film began to come out in the nineteenth century, due to the continuation of time, the romantic spirit of the literature it is easy to love a movie producer. When the film makers of these works into movies,cheap UGG boots, because to speak of their identity and location of different methods on the interpretation of literary works are also different; especially when the film is produced by the Hollywood film industry when the question was significantly even more interesting and complex. As one of the United States who have a British colony, and today they occupy the dominant position of the world, when Hollywood films selected these novels as the basis for the film script, they do with novels about the status of the colonial and colonial description? Their interpretation of these novels, and the difference between the British film-makers? They deliberately ignore these colonial description of the plot or to emphasize it? This is nothing more than cultural imperialism on behalf of the twentieth century the Hollywood industry and the colonial empire, the nineteenth century Ji Daying novel dialogue. This will be the following seven films, discuss the American film industry's treatment of colonial issues, and their colonial imagination. One James. Alfred (James Ivory) the Passage to India Be King
the eighteenth, nineteenth-century British colonial desire for tourism in the number of colonies from their imagination. For them, the colony is a self-potential can be extended beyond the limits of self where self is a subject to highlight the location of the other; to as A man is his own, that would be very troubling. Of the British gentry, whether it is in other countries or colonies to European Tour, is a romantic adventure filled; In the For the lower middle class or poor English, the colonial possessions is a land of opportunity, is a company re-offenders can live in this place; as Caffee king in power, machine wishes to South America and Africa from.
Basically, the literature is difficult to escape the stereotype of the colonial-style depiction, again, drawn in the film is also full of shooting and Western stereotypes of other races. As in These are those of his British / colonial imagination, generally speaking, these two extreme rigid ︰ imagine a colony is another mysterious, beautiful place,Bailey UGG boots, allowing the British release of the potential and desire to re-understand their own; Second, the colony is dark, brutal, evil place, guiding the killing of people, such as greed and other evil desires like that here in the fall of the British into the abyss of hell. Interestingly, the British produced films tend to focus on the comparison described by the British in Edwardian feel the joy of physical and sensory suppression, and how in other countries such as Italy, Greece and India were released. American productions are more critical when the British colonists in the colony, which inadvertently revealed the nature of greed and killing; especially the American production of century criticism of the United States sent troops to his country, and even lambasting the hypocrisy of mankind. James Avery
director and his work a little group of very popular works of Foster, has shot three films adapted from novels Foster, were Mexico Leith's Lover Ivor The main focus is a little criticism of the Victoria and Edwardian England and Conservative hypocrisy of high society and social change; such as Although the film, there are still arranged the role of Paul,UGGs, that when the British and the colonial relationship, but the whole thing is still focused on talking about the UK class gap. And binding (bonding). Especially in the Italy or France, etc., can not be resolved to ask the body in the UK can be solved. Therefore, the ink on the repressed desire Lisburn how to get relief is the focus of the film. Basically, these are bound and repressed desire on the British, are lower class and the colonial territories by residents, before awakening from the asexual life; in the Lovers
DH Lawrence (DH Lawrence) was so Foster commented: who's body as a tool for masturbation, this is Foster. not be tolerated, it affects the sexual issues he dealt with when the caution, so Foster's role is abstinence. David even in the film In Aide La cancel her marriage with Lang Nepal, she accidentally roam to an overgrown weeds around the abandoned temple, the temple is full of pillars carved statue of the senses and sex. In Foster's novel do not have a plot, the film director David even joined in this paragraph is simply to emphasize Aide La repressed desires in mind, how this mysterious place in India to be provoked; and Film Indian portraits at the beginning of this shortage is the Aide La in the Indian temple goddess seen, showing the director's attention to this subject. However, from Ai Dela was Mabalane echo cave and chaos caused by the illusion of sense can see she still can not honestly face the awakening of her consciousness, because it is her social behavior is prohibited; and Foster in This novel of the caves in the episode description is very ambiguous. A fragment of the director in dealing with this, he did not really clear what happened, Yi Jisi whether to enter the cave where Ai Dela, and Ai Dela generated in the cave are the audience the illusion not know why, and Then there are critics that David Foster was also the case even as a
slightly compared to the conductivity of the Ivor three movies, human relations and conflict. However, many critics pointed out that Foster's novel is the most important statement of the colonizers and the colonized can not connect; Even as Feilin Si and Ai Jisi such people can not be friends under the colonial status quo. At the beginning and end of the novel has a similar description to highlight the distance between the two, start Chandrapore a residential area of the city are two different descriptions, and, most Houfeilinsi and Yi Jisi riding with two people, the novel in the final a description that even if they want to be friends, but the horse refused to ﹑ ﹑ the Earth would not think that the sky is not the time to see Foster the relationship between the British and Indians, the pessimistic view. But this point in David's film can not even find that, although the Even the Indians do not like, but in the end of the film, even if he Feilin Si Yi Jisi do realize that couples will not have the opportunity to meet the director in dealing with the Feilin Si Yi Jisi that scene when the couple farewell and did not deliberately show a sense of distance between them; and the whole movie and not an end in this scene, but ends at Ai Dela reading Ai Jisi sent her letter of apology and thanks, after looking from the house out of the window, the camera stopped on the expression of calm in the Aide La. Even if David does not even realize that the focus of the novel, his view is still different from Foster, contrast, his interpretation is more optimistic, Yi Jisi Aide La admit mistakes to the last letter of this move appears to still be a symbol of the British connection with India.
Qi Pulin (Kipling) works mainly in India but also to describe the living conditions of the British-based, especially the story of British troops in India, his work has always been more than a sarcastic tone. Because of his work has often exotic description, so his work has been adapted to become the object of filmmakers. Houston (John Huston) Qipu Lin's short stories adapted from Qipu Lin once said: straight into the canyon. The handling of the film, the director stressed that the local people as the one Daniel Caerphilly for the 2028 BC King Alexander's successor, the final mark and from the stone that the king was actually a member of Freemasonry, which not only that all the arrangements for the colonization of human behavior has existed in the ancient past, but also highlights the British rule in Caerphilly or any other country is a task assigned by God. However, the director added another two in the movie plot, with the Caerphilly man can not control nature, one as a saint of a bolt through to the campaign has opened suddenly calmed down, and disclosed the shooting of the Gun in Daniel Arrow belt accident brought a victory without fighting, these are beyond the Peach and Daniel's surprise, outside the West's control; and, claiming to be God in Daniel, married Susan stronger when The local priest said that God should be printed by a local maximum Brad decided, all that is not fully suppress the British rulers of colonial are the people. Although the film highlights the Peach and Daniel are still the romantic spirit of adventure, but the director is also a conscious demonstration of the limits of the British colonial government forces.
In addition, Conrad (Joseph Conrad) works have been made into multiple movies or TV series, not only because his literary reputation, but also because of his work the subject of the film industry development . Extension of the film is a vision, when most people still can not travel for a compensation when his country's desire, the film offers is a way the audience into another world; therefore, as Conrad described the exotic genre scenes, the film naturally Industrial producers of all ages. Interpretation of each director is different from the perspective of the novel, Conrad works in the analysis of complex human nature and criticism of colonialism, can not necessarily found in the movie. Although compared to the works of British film maker, the U.S. production of The.
see the British acts of greed and fraud. Apparently, the director Richard. Brooks seems to strongly criticize the colonial destruction of the main acts of the colonial state, but if carefully observed his handling of the protagonist Jim, Jim is still full of that found in the eighteenth, nineteenth century, the pursuit of wandering hero, adventure, the romantic spirit of self-challenge; but this Jim is also still highlight film (Bi Deao figure decoration) the spirit of the main tragic hero. Especially at the end of the film, Jim Duo Minglei to fulfill its commitment to the leader, for his innocence is responsible for the tragedy caused by, holding his gun to head Maizhaotaibu accepted disposal, the director will head across the lens falls on Jim Step on the heroic. Bide Ao map did not reveal any expression of guilt, but a kind of tragic hero to go to justice, but also better than one majestic sorrow; relative to the handle on the novel, it seems that civilization is still at highlighting the British upbringing. In addition, the final film is also specifically highlighted in this funeral exotic tendencies, there is no shortage of arguments of Orientalism, and the funeral of this fire is not the plot of the novel, the director treated as such inadvertently expressed his views on the colony. In addition, the narrator is clearly Marlow (Marlowe), but the film's narrator is not so obvious, the story of the plot also showed a single line of development, the inner struggle of Jim and change, and not clear, especially in the abandoned Jim
by the Coppola film Coppola said he was filming And on into the dark heart of the African continent, and Scott Ladd movie also entered the Captain center of Vietnam, is also full of unknown jungle. This is a very controversial film, some critics question why Coppola would choose Joseph Conrad's talking about war movies, mainly on a point that war is hell, but Conrad has been criticized for Coppola just wanted to hide his literary reputation of some of the concepts the movie bits. But I do not think Conrad director Coppola is to grasp the thrust of the novel, and Kiel was led by a high helicopter bombing campaign Viet Cong villages, can be said to deal with the best movie in the history of a battle, while the performance of a war, numb, depressed, and joy.
not even deal with David Alfred slightly Edwardian works of British colonial British colonial shackles of rationality in people's minds to be free, in The absurdity, in a battlefield full of killing, was ordered to maintain the laws of civilization, Captain Wei Ladd to kill convicted of murder can be hereby Colonel, can not help but questioned the legality of the Battle of the slash. In fact, you can hereby only a anomalies and arbitrary killings tendency, like that placed high Kiel Wagner's music for the bombing of the war like the smell incendiary ﹑ ﹑ taste good location for a surfer who bombed a village, do hereby clearly than can be it? Can in fact be very clear on the battlefield is hereby hypocrisy, Wei Ladd was assassinated in the moment before, can hereby said: It is lewd.
novel The movie In Conrad's ; movie Wei Rudd Colonel Captain hereby Although there may be a desire to meet the emotional, but the director of the Wei Rudd and the correspondence between available and is hereby not be inked, so why the sudden assassination of the last-wei can be hereby Rudd reasons unknown, the feeling of a kind of fracture,bailey UGG boots, not persuasive. Most importantly, Coppola select the war, such as the Korean War, Vietnam, Cuba, the Persian Gulf, will undoubtedly also a big brother to save the weaker countries to the colonial mentality. However, people can not help but want to ask is that Coppola is also aware of the Hollywood film industry, the location of cultural colonization.
Although contrast, the American film dealing with issues of colonialism than the British Film sharp criticism of the approach is also more direct and obvious. However, the contrary is now the film industry to Hollywood as the center, and they often take the place of the third world, the last film was sold to the third world, although it is necessary for the development of acts of global capitalism, but also form a kind of cultural imperialism. The most thought-provoking, the whole world to accept a Hollywood film education and film in the unconscious will of the people of other countries dealing with internalized the stereotype, which is described in the audience watching these films with the colonial, non- not alert.
No comments:
Post a Comment